|
|
|
||||||||||
![]() |
You know I couldn't give a sad entry a title like that, right? No doubt you've extrapolated that Cassie is doing better. Thanks for selling your collective souls. That must be what's doing the trick.
I woke up this morning and saw that Cassie was looking much less scary. Her excretions weren't normal, but it wasn't nearly as bad as it was yesterday. I went to work, intending to ask if I could leave early to go buy an infrared light, as my Parakeet Handbook suggests. I got to work and the supervisor said, "Monique! Are you working today?" in this frazzled voice. I answered, "Yes. Why? Is something wrong?" She said, "It's just that there are so many people here today." Indeed, the store was full of employees, including someone who supposedly just quit. "Well, I was going to ask you..." I began, and she cut me off. "You want the day off? Great! Go! Go!!!" Man, that was easy. So I went to PetSmart, the only pet store I know of that I thought might have infrared lights. They didn't, but they directed me to my new favorite pet store in the world, Wet Pets. First of all, the name Wet Pets reminds me of Mutt Cutts from Dumb & Dumber. Second of all, it's a huge store with friendly, intelligent employees. The guy who helped me was knowledgeable about parakeets (unlike every single PetSmart employee I have ever encountered) and helped me pick out a light. He also recommended a certain type of medicine to add to her water. I described her symptoms and situation, and he agreed that the problem was most likely stress due to the arrival of Pidgie. (By the way, this is the reason I did not take Cassie to the vet today. I felt the trip to the vet would be stressful, and I didn't want to compound the problem by stressing her out more. If she does not continue to improve, I will take her to the vet. It is open on weekends.) I ran a bunch of other errands and then came home. Being bathed in the infrared light freaked Cassie out (it looks like a pink alien ship has just come to take her away) but it seems to be doing the trick. Her droppings have solidified quite a bit. And I should know. I am a connoisseur of bird droppings these days. Ash (who gave Pidgie his newest nickname) offered to take care of the birds while I am on vacation. I'd love to leave them in her care, because I know she'd take wonderful care of them. But I don't want to stress them out by driving them to Los Angeles and then leaving them in a strange environment for a month. So it looks like I'll have to turn down her kind offer. We will now take a brief break so you can all be proud of me. This is what my professor wrote on my evaluation for Experiments in Poetic Form: Monique was a fully engaged, attentive student in this seminar. She embraced the assignments with panache and great vigor, making each experiment her own. Her poetic voice is spirited, vivacious, and fresh. She delivered a lively and graceful collaborative reading of an e.e. cummings sonnet. Her final project, a soaring, passionate, beautiful sonnet sequence, demonstrates a powerful interrogation of the form. It was a pleasure to have her in class. Grade: A This is what she wrote on my sonnets: A fiercely passionate, beautiful set of sonnets, Monique. It soars out of itself and back into the tradition, aligning in the direction of Bernadette Mayer's work, giving us a strong, angry, tender, petulant and wild female voice. Hard won, I suspect. Brava! Okay, it's a little overblown. But I love her description of my sequence as an "interrogation of the form." Only a poet could have put it like that, I think. So, if you'd like to come over and strew roses at my feet, let me know! I'll give you my address! No, no. Only kidding. Seriously, I'm proud of myself. I don't feel "I fooled her!" about this A. I earned this one. I went out with a bunch of classmates on Wednesday, including Mickey. He said he really liked my sonnet sequence, which of course, made me smile. I was intensely involved in talking with him when Checkers said, "I'm available for conversation too." I looked at Checkers and said, "Okay. But I'm talking to Mickey right now." And I turned back to Mickey (who was grinning amusedly) and we continued talking. About what? Couldn't tell ya. The bar was loud and I could barely hear him. Did it matter? Not so much. Later, Checkers said, "Why are you so much nicer to Mickey than you are to me?" I wasn't drunk enough to explain my unbridled lust, thank god. I said, "Well, Checkers, I just don't get to talk to Mickey that often." Which is god's honest truth. At least partially. He's an interesting fellow, that Checkers. He's the one who writes fling-a-shoe-at-the-keyboard poetry that looks like this: "yammajamma mama pajajamma. 22 { ^floo^oo^{)" There are some people at our school who regard Checkers and his work very highly. Toker said that Checkers is his favorite poet (not counting yours truly) at our school. Wayne said that his poetry was "sometimes like music" and that Checkers "is the kind of person I came to this school to meet." But neither of them were in my Experiments class. They don't know Checkers the way I do. Checkers didn't do any of the assignments. Instead of a straightforward sonnet or what have you, he would always turn in some gibberish. Often, the logic behind a three line poem of his would take him ten minutes to explain. Sometimes, he would compose his assignments in class, on the spot. To a certain extent, this is endearing. Checkers goes beyond that extent. To me, his behavior doesn't convey the impression that he is, as others claim, innovative and groundbreaking and original. This conveys the impression that he's a big fraud, that he is unable to write a straightforward poem. Even though he hits on something once in a while, he has not yet earned my respect as a writer. What Checkers boils down to, both personally and professionally, is that he is unable to meet anyone halfway. All interactions must be on his terms. "I like your poem, except you should change this line." He hasn't yet won me over as a friend, and he assumes a familiarity that isn't there. I believe this is his pattern, and it puts people off. He's very high maintenance, very needy of attention, when all he really ever does is hold court about his "process" and his issues. As a writer, he doesn't meet his audience halfway. He encodes his poetry to such a ridiculous extent that it's largely unintelligible. You have to be a cryptographer to understand half of what he writes. And perhaps it's just that I don't "get it." Perhaps he's one of those love him or hate him poets. But I don't think so. I think I have him all figured out. Here are some random things:
365 days ago (give or take): Holy mother of god. I think this is a resolution I actually kept. This is one of those one year ago links that makes me realize, not how much my LIFE has changed, but how much I have changed. |
egu: i want to
what i'm reading:
what i'm writing:
anything:
journal quote of the day: You mean that wasn't the real Brad Pitt? I feel so betrayed.
mood ring:
you learn something new... escapades update
you should also know about
|
|
|
|
|
|
|